Very true. The unfortunate side I see, is that there appears to be a war on the construct of being a man (we all know where that's coming from) and this extends to having a mission. Man or woman, it matters not, when you take away purpose, what do you have left?
-
-
-
Your purpose can only be surrendered, not taken. Why would any man do that?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I got control of drinking by quitting for good. Made a huge difference. Wasn't a huge drunk, but it was having an effect
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Internal locus of control and the resultant belief that one actually has CHOICE and AUTONOMY go far.
-
Yes indeed. Man cannot live with eternal chains and no hope.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That’s a good summary. What constitutes an appropriate mission to give purpose seems to be built on deep seated beliefs which can be hard to shift. Esp when the mission is foundered on unrealistic expectations.
-
No. The mission is found in relationships, specifically the legacy a man leaves. Offspring, adopted kids, family, students, any number of people a man can help to grow and leave a lasting impact. These are all that survive a man’s death and transcend religion or politics.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.