My conciousness proves only my consciousness. Perhaps all my percieced interactions are illusory. Boltzman brain
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @LichJim
No. But my original statement remains true; no logical rebuttal against it. But to me that doesn't mean much; all of science is based on a logical fallacy; "past observations can predict future occurrences". there is no logical argument in favor of the sun rising tomorrow
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @LichJim
That's an "argument from incredulity" which is also a logical fallacy. But yeah I agree that it's stupid.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @LichJim
The point is that there are limits to what can be argued with logic. "Evidence" are empirical observations taking place in a world we cannot logically prove to be real. You have to start from some axioms to get anywhere.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Sounds like you both agree that advancing beyond innate childhood solipsistic thought boils down to a choice of either having faith that other people are real or a sociopathic belief that all other people are objects to be moved within your personal story.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.