“A trained and prepared militia on hand for a State to repel an aggressive Federal Government”? Now why would a government charter put a proviso in place ENCOURAGING armed rebellion? Especially at a time armed rebellions were occurring? This is a modern misreading.
Very much so. And I think we’re both trying to be sensible about it. But to the point you made, regarding “scary guns”, a handgun can be intimidating, but I suspect we’re referring to something else? And to the point on that, WHY are these weapons so frightening?
-
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
But what, specifically, would make the weapon frightening to others?
Koniec rozmowy
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.