“A trained and prepared militia on hand for a State to repel an aggressive Federal Government”? Now why would a government charter put a proviso in place ENCOURAGING armed rebellion? Especially at a time armed rebellions were occurring? This is a modern misreading.
The fact that those mechanisms even exist provide the prescribed recourse for citizens to affect change in their government, rather than armed conflict against it. So why are so many these days arming themselves AGAINST the government rather than in service to it?
-
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
Okay, I see where we’re coming from now. Allow me to adjust. Now—yes, I agree that background checks, penalizing offenders and closing loopholes are sensible policy. But I also agree with others that such a ban is necessary for the public good.
Koniec rozmowy
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.