Hmm. So, more of an argument that could be proven logically, rather than a set of abstract goals? Mm, yeah, that's a wee bit more difficult.
-
...an argument could be made on that basis. That argument would not really be whether or not it's bad, but instead how folks feel about it.
In terms of a strictly logical sense (every instance of censorship is bad)--I don't think you can make a case without cherry-picked data.