2/ To be clear, there's no question of Runnels' guilt in the 2003 prison murder of Stanley Wiley. He pleaded guilty at trial, despite knowing the state was seeking the death penalty.http://bit.ly/2Pfy5Nz
-
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
3/ At his punishment hearing, where jurors in part weigh how likely a capital murder convict is to be dangerous in the future, a witness was called to testify on the levels of security Runnels would be under in prison.http://bit.ly/2Pfy5Nz
Pokaż ten wątek -
4/ But that witness, A.P. Merillat, has given incorrect testimony on prison security classifications that has since led to two overturned death sentences in Texas.http://bit.ly/2Pfy5Nz
Pokaż ten wątek -
5/ Runnels’ lawyers say the testimony was false, and Merillat acknowledged that he might have been wrong. The question is whether Merillat's testimony was the reason why the jury decided he’d be a future danger, therefore giving him a death sentence.http://bit.ly/2Pfy5Nz
Pokaż ten wątek -
6/ The state's brief argues that the jury would have found Runnels to be a future danger regardless of his prison security classification. But Runnels and his lawyers hope the incorrect testimony will prompt the Supreme Court to stop his execution.http://bit.ly/2Pfy5Nz
Pokaż ten wątek -
7/7 Runnels is scheduled to be executed Wednesday evening in Texas’ death chamber in Huntsville. Read more on his case from
@jsmccullou.http://bit.ly/2Pfy5NzPokaż ten wątek
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
How sad.
-
In PA our courts are now going thru many cases where there were absolute lies told during prosecution.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
- Koniec rozmowy
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.