The best way for social media companies to decide what speech is & isn't permitted is to mirror standards in First Amendment law. NOT b/c they have to (THEY DON'T) but b/c there's are decades of clear standards & wisdom in the cases about how to have #freespeech in the real world
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @glukianoff
I fear they are not trying to adhere to any standards of democracy or ethics, and never have, unfortunately. Democracy has never been the point of big platforms' corporate mission (or personal ambition on the founder level). It's always been a power grab, seems like...
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @TessaMakesLove @glukianoff
Why should private companies adhere to political motives? Companies adhering to their written rules is textbook capitalism, I thought Republicans were for that...
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
In this case, I have been mainly talking about tech platforms quietly (and tightly) working with the state, almost since inception of the former. The tale of connecting people to each other and supporting free expression was a bit of a marketing gimmick to begin with.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.