This article is awful on linguistic merits alone since it borrows the reporting style of "Pravda," which I find unforgivable. This is exactly how free-thinking artists with clear eyes and live souls were covered in the Soviet establishment media.https://buff.ly/32EMKY5
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
The good news is that history straightens things out. There was a time when a large number of adults felt very smart for believing and repeating Pravda's headlines. They sincerely thought that dissidents were crazy and dangerous mofos. But time passed, and facts prevailed.
1 odpowiedź 1 podany dalej 2 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
W odpowiedzi do @TessaMakesLove
might you say more about what in the article reminded you of Pravda? I didn't experience the piece as propagandistic, while granting that it didn't justify in rigorous detail its assumption that an unfettered marketplace of ideas isn't a flawless vehicle for identifying the truth
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @erimaccf
It's the solemn absolutist tone based on the assumption that the establishment narrative is "obviously true" (while in reality, it is either a subjective preference or a blatant lie), and that anybody who dares deviate is a fool, at best, and dangerous in any case.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @TessaMakesLove
thanks for the reply. seems to me the establishment narrative about COVID is still emerging from study & debate. I grant for sure that the piece has a point of view, but I tend to see it as more or less right.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @erimaccf @TessaMakesLove
maybe it could have done better by identifying areas of greatest confidence and greatest uncertainty within that narrative.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @erimaccf
Unfortunately, at least to my senses and in my honest estimate of a former academic and an artist thirsty for facts whatever they are, it's rooted in corruption and payola, with smearing of dissenting voices to make sure that the narrative is shaped from the top down.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @TessaMakesLove
thanks, again, for elaborating. I agree it's trying to paint some sources as more credible and others as less so. I also acknowledge that doing that can temporarily cement errors through fads and unrecognized biases (replication crisis, etc.), but I think it also has value, both
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @erimaccf @TessaMakesLove
given time. I will say perhaps more to your point that the best criticism of a dissenting voice would generally come from a specialist speaking to the merits of the critique in requisite detail, though I also see value in a sociological lens on both prevailing & dissenting views.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Thank you for a good conversation! In my observations, some of the best (intellectually and factually) reporting has been originating from a few voices that the establishment treats like anathema. Some of them even offered to publicly debate establishment voices but to no avail.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.