Thread warning.
So there is a letter (still considered a controversy 

) that calls for, essentially, letting people voice what they think and express their views—regardless of the majority consensus any given moment—without the risk of being fired. 1/
Again, I have to disagree with much feeling! I do stand for that thing that Americans call "free speech." Yes, it's politicized on both ends but in principle, without it, the society descends into darkness quickly. And it means "all speech."
-
-
It has never meant all speech. From the very first origins of it. The harm principle was *always* part of the considerations around free speech.
-
There is a vested interest to paint it as absolute. Not coincidentally, much of this lies with people who profit from proliferating harm via speech. But the debate was never "do we draw a line", and always "where do we draw a line"
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.