Thread warning.
So there is a letter (still considered a controversy 

) that calls for, essentially, letting people voice what they think and express their views—regardless of the majority consensus any given moment—without the risk of being fired. 1/
I am not sure what you mean by bad-faith dialogue. For instance, I would sign that letter in a second if someone asked me, and it's in good faith. For context, I've never had a large platform I would afraid to lose. But we have a lot of collective trauma and need to heal it.
-
-
It's not your faith. It's the originators of a letter. There is no good faith interest in freedom of speech. The goal was to stir a controversy, and cleave off some people who would be appalled by their hate speech if they knew, but who've now cosigned.
-
See also Sartre: "They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.