Thread warning.
So there is a letter (still considered a controversy 

) that calls for, essentially, letting people voice what they think and express their views—regardless of the majority consensus any given moment—without the risk of being fired. 1/
I disagree with you. Both of us feel passionate about our respective viewpoints, and it's a good thing. I respect your feeling as much as I respect mine. I'm coming from a place of growing up where the ideology of controlling reality by controlling speech has temporarily won.
-
-
We're heading towards the same place because we blindly engage with bad-faith dialogue, and we give it huge platforms. The aim of bad-faith dialogue around free speech is to destroy free speech, and dictatorships around the world have shown time and again the approach works.
-
I am not sure what you mean by bad-faith dialogue. For instance, I would sign that letter in a second if someone asked me, and it's in good faith. For context, I've never had a large platform I would afraid to lose. But we have a lot of collective trauma and need to heal it.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.