Towards a twenty-first-century Luddism: my case for why decomputerization should be a core demand of the climate movementhttps://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/sep/17/tech-climate-change-luddites-data …
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
W odpowiedzi do @bentarnoff
Yes! We should liberate our heads from all the linguistic noise that is offered to us by Big Tech companies with the idea of making us feel helpless and outdated without their products. "Progress" is just a soundbite to sell us things (and surveil us at the same time).
3 odpowiedzi 4 podane dalej 7 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @TessaMakesLove @bentarnoff
you know you can log off twitter right?
3 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 31 polubionych -
Mike, you’re right that the alarmists here are, at best, missing some forests. Folks at the
@HumaneTech_ are more on point: tweaks to some incentive structures are good.1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @ben_mathes@micsolana i jeszcze
Tweaks to incentive structures are economic not technological. We can incentivize good behavior—do not pollute lest you incur a tax; do build hardware with renewable materials—& punish bad behavior. But we 100% need technological progress & it isn’t happening fast enough.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @david_doswell@micsolana i jeszcze
No, there are non-monetary incentives that drive mass behavior on social media. Likes (dopamine hits), reach for influence, etc. You seem to be talking about some other issue。
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @ben_mathes@micsolana i jeszcze
I’m talking about whether what the article proposes, or any recoiling from technological progress whatsoever, has any merit. I posit it doesn’t.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @david_doswell@ben_mathes i jeszcze
Personally, I find asking these questions before venturing into large scale projects to be the only sane approach to technology (or life, for that matter). They are existentially responsible: "Progress towards what and progress for whom?"
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @TessaMakesLove@ben_mathes i jeszcze
Progress towards: - reduction in infant morality - increase in communication - access to financial services - curing infectious diseases - extending human lifespan - improving food-source nutrition - allocating hazardous waste - scaling electric transportation
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @david_doswell@TessaMakesLove i jeszcze
For whom, for me, is distinct, if I understood where you’re going. Obviously for everyone. But one person’s invention is not necessarily another person’s resource. But we can have that conversation, too. There is a way to do that.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
I highly recommend watching "Plug and Pray," a doc about Weizenbaum who obviously came up with Eliza but was also a very intelligent and responsible human being. There is a bit on progress / trends there.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.