Here's a bad kind of argument: If you favor X and some very bad people favored X, then you are wrong and, by association, bad. Here is @evefairbanks in WaPo likening me & others who favor “facts, reason, and civil discourse” to defenders of slavery:https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/08/29/conservatives-rhetoric-confederacy-south-civil-war/ …
-
-
There is no such comparison being made. Respectfully, it’s a bad misreading. Haidt et al are being critiqued for failure to discuss misuses of ideals, and hence obscuring the way bad stuff gets masked.
-
To be perfectly true to linear facts, I think
@evefairbanks alone could speak with certainty about how the parallel was intended. Anybody else's reading is an interpretation that is dependent on the individual emotional and cultural lens. But I did find the comparison misguided. - Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.