Here's a bad kind of argument: If you favor X and some very bad people favored X, then you are wrong and, by association, bad. Here is @evefairbanks in WaPo likening me & others who favor “facts, reason, and civil discourse” to defenders of slavery:https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/08/29/conservatives-rhetoric-confederacy-south-civil-war/ …
-
-
Catch phrases like "free speech" or "social justice" have been linguistically abused and repurposed a million times over. The very organization of culture doesn't allow for language to exist in its designed form for longer than 5 min. It is very unfortunate but all-pervasive.
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
In practical terms, I don't think it's fair or justified to contextually compare
@JonHaidt to slave owners. It's not fair to do so because words have power and consequences. It is an ironic way of falling into a scholastic pitfall when criticizing the scholastic approach. -
There is no such comparison being made. Respectfully, it’s a bad misreading. Haidt et al are being critiqued for failure to discuss misuses of ideals, and hence obscuring the way bad stuff gets masked.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.