So, about that abuse of language (and truth).
For that reason, I cannot stand Kim Dotcom for example, who I consider a bandit because he got rich in the back of artists like me.
-
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
I think that without twisting the laws of language, it is very difficulty to be a "pro-freedom" intellectual and simultaneously be happy about the arrest of any one human being who has made a choice to expose war crimes. As a result of war, people die. It is anti-freedom.
Pokaż ten wątek -
It has nothing to do with liking or hating him as a human being. He might very well be a megalomaniac, I have no idea. But how do you stop war crimes? By tweeting nicely? Or you don't—and just celebrate branded rebels when enough time has passed, and it's safe?
Pokaż ten wątek -
Hence, it all boils down to respecting the sanctity of language, or not. If the language is used to describe reality correctly, then compassion and courage are not partisan issues. If it is used to walk within party lines and build resumes, then each of us is alone.
Pokaż ten wątek -
I could also do without typos but this is how you know that I am passionate about the subject. Typos. No passion, no typos. No typos, no passion.
Pokaż ten wątek
Koniec rozmowy
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.