Pete Jarvis

You're right. If it was me or one of my kids, I'd want myself or them spared of this reaction and face no consequence. Then again, that's just "self-interest" and "nepotism". How do you think a little Billy or Susie behaves at work when everyone knows the boss is their daddy?

My sense is that we should support that individuals face consequences for bad actions even family members. The response to their actions however I feel should not be emotive or derogatory. Why? If we ourselves mirror the bad behavior, then surely we lessen the moral lesson.

I’m just calling it what it indisputably is: Abhorrent. Terrible. An ugly stain on free software that can never be fully removed. But we have to try, and that starts with removing him from every position of power he holds.

Understood. I see you as a force for good, you have driven awareness for change, and through that enabled change. You haven't tried you have succeeded. My worry was and remains that the emotive language being used in this context detracts from a powerful position and argument.

Consider that you might find the use of emotive language a detractor because you've been taught that emotions are bad, and that you've been taught that emotions are bad because they're 'female-coded'? Our rage is valid.

What can be done with the rage? How is it converted into a set of material actions and requests and are directed to enable change? Al proposed Richard step down immediately, what else is to be done? How is the request framed and communicated? Who sends it, to whom?

Men like you can look at our rage and say 'I need to speak louder' 'I need to speak out more often' 'I need to protest if necessary' 'I need to cause a scene' 'I need to create a fuss' 'I need to refuse to shut up until the situation is remedied'

Holy tone police batman

My worry is that while twitter is a powerful platform change, it can and is also used to bully and drive social conformity. I see value in calling out for change but I am concerned by the vitriolic language. This feels dangerous. We are and should be better than this.

I see you as a agent for change. My worry is with such power comes responsibility. One has to stand above the crowd and wield such influence as a force for good, not fan the emotional flames to create a mob. Why? Mobs have no true leaders, tempered debate or conscience.