Can you translate this into words I can understand cus i know nothing about politics lol
-
-
-
Twitter is acting as a publisher which means they decide what can be posted on their platform. However, they are getting protections normally gifted to a platform which strips them of liability for what is posted on their sites. If they were truly a publisher, they’d be liable
- 8 weitere Antworten
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
this is definitely good but it’s a bit disappointing that trump basically completely overlooked this whole issue until his own tweets were going to be directly interfered with
-
Better than never. He was working on a conference for these monopolies before tho and I don’t think this was entirely influenced by recent events alone.
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Can’t be bannrd for calling someone a duck or squirrel face now?

- Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Executive orders aren't laws. In fact, they aren't legally binding whatsoever. Executive orders allow the President to order around his own subordinates. They don't allow him to order around private citizens. Twitter can completely ignore it and nothing will happen to it.
-
Even if it were legally binding, it would have the OPPOSITE effect. Twitter would be liable for its users' posts, which means they would have much more of an incentive to censor and delete anything that could be offensive.
- 1 weitere Antwort
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
I remember getting banned randomly for a copypasta they deemed as "offensive" and I couldn't post for a whole day lol The T actually made a good call
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
-
-
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.



