Ok great. Next question. Let's say you are at a tournament (my tournament). I'm responsible for random people coming in and playing and having a good time, and I can't do that if you say certain things. It's not a very long list. And if you say those things, now what?
-
Going all the way back, all I was saying to that original homie was, if you don't want people in the melee space to question you and others based on language, you have to understand the rule and not break it. And then I shared the rule. If you don't care then get questioned.
Going on to tell someone your personal OPINION on the morality of the word, is not “just” explaining the rule. The rule would be, “Don’t say offensive things because the space is for everyone and different people have different beliefs.” What you did is thinly veiled advocacy.
-
-
Wow ok so wait: you have no problem with the rule, you just have a problem with the way I worded it? Because you assume that my intent is to push some agenda? I'm trying to figure out what your issue is and I'm suddenly unclear on your position on assuming intent
-
You’re pretending to argue from a neutral standpoint. You could just say, “I personally think this is immoral. So don’t say it.” Saying you feel bad cuz they don’t know better and are ignorant, just alienates people with a different view from you. That’s not all welcoming.
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.