16yr olds shouldn’t be an activist for anything. They should be getting their homework done and enjoying their childhood. Anyone that becomes an activist at a young age has been taught to fear. Teaching fear to kids before they’re even adults is mental abuse/manipulation.
It’s not against free speech. I’m not advocating against her right to say it. I’m saying a child shouldn’t be used as a political pawn.
-
-
Again, you said that 16 year olds should not be activists for anything, I'm quoting you. The 1st amendment protects the right to protest and you're introducing an age requirement to that right. Seems anti-free speech to me. Idk how you can say that's not against free speech (1/3)
-
And I think children shouldn't be used as political pawns either, but the solution isn't to eliminate them from the political process. You use your speech and argue why the chessmasters of these pawns are arguing in bad faith and make a convincing case to the public. (2/3)
- 12 weitere Antworten
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.



