Technicals  🧾 📉

No, THEY do.

Well both are wrong so what’s your point? This tweet is worded so poorly I really thought you were advocating hentai of pre-pubescent children

Ok, then we’ll agree to disagree. I don’t think that a body type that’s identical to adults in anime can have the morality of attraction changed based on the subjective ruling by the artist and the people that vehemently hunt those artists down can suck my balls.

There are plenty of irl pre-18 people who are fully developed, body development is not tied to a specific age. 18 is just a buffer zone.If she’s not of age,turn your dick off. I do agree that alot of artists overdevelop their characters as a whole so it’s really context based.

Yes, but we’re also not talking about real life here. If a 17yr old character in a show has an upcoming birthday are you going to realistically just start giving people passes? It’s a fucking cartoon

Considering how widely accepted Persona and Fire Emblem waifus are I don’t think mostly anyone considers 16+ fully developed anime characters to be pedophilic or Ephebophilic.But under 16 morality should come into play.The anatomical mistakes of an artist don’t justify your faps.

You’d be wrong on that, but anatomy is clearly the issue. Not a number the artist slaps on

Sometimes it’s a slapped on number, sometimes (most times) it’s a conscious choice. Given how adult-looking minors exist irl, you should consider the context of the character and see if it is meant to reflect that phenenmenon. I can provide examples.