Name me 1 other than America. Also, free speech isn’t just speech you agree with. It includes ALL speech with exception to actionable calls to violence and yelling “fire” in a crowded theater.https://twitter.com/PKlarg/status/1170041397946269696 …
-
-
Antwort an @Technicals_
Literally every other western country, mate. Most European, Most Scandinavian, Australia, Canada and whatnot have protections for speech and expressions. You can argue that hate speech laws are against free speech, but it's a moot point, most countries don't have those.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @TehRealWaldo
Any restriction on speech besides literal violence is against freedom of speech. That’s not debatable. It’s simple. Are you allowed to say what you think? If the answer is no then you don’t have the freedom.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @Technicals_
Again, most countries don't have those. Canada, Australia, most Scandinavian and European countries that aren't England or Germany don't have those.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @TehRealWaldo @Technicals_
The point is that America really isn't special when it comes to Free speech protection, we just think we do as a result of anti-soviet propaganda telling us that it is.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @TehRealWaldo
It’s special because there’s 0 restrictions on speech. Besides actual violence
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @Technicals_
You were complaining about discrimination laws with Netherlands. We have those too.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir
I didn’t complain about discrimination laws. I’m saying you can’t have freedom of speech if there’s a ban on verbal discrimination which is the clarification I was asking for. Not all discrimination is tangible. You simply have to be prejudice
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.



