-
My main issue is his total disregard for the existance of gender dysphoria, http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2016/gender-lines-science-transgender-identity/ … in addition to being unwilling to back down from defending eugenics and lobster hierarchy theory, both of which have been disproven.
This article doesn’t disprove a theory of hierarchy or the idea that biology dictates it. The study you just linked reaffirms the existence of biological female and male brains contributing to transgenderism which ironically supports Peterson’s biology theory
-
-
I’ve seen him do debates on the issues that Trans people face but never have I seen him dismiss that there’s a problem
-
Also eugenics? Imma need a citation
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Not sure if you fully read the article, there is an graphic indicating the relationship between men transitioning to women and how their brains closer resemble that of a biological women than that of a biological man.
-
Yeah I read the whole thing. That disproves the idea of trans gender being a social construct and actually attributes more to a theory of genetics as seen in their identical and fraternal twins study citation.
- 16 weitere Antworten
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
This article was not meant to disprove lobster hierarchy, it was meant to display the obvious existance of gender dysphoria
-
I don’t think that’s been refuted? Until recently it was classified as a disorder in the realm of psychology. Since then, solutions are still being thought up to curve the insanely high suicide rates, but I’m pretty sure he’s never refuted that.
- 18 weitere Antworten
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.