Also, if you’re bringing personal beef into an argument of legitimacy in rulings within the community, I feel that would do nothing but increase bias. Which again, is why I didn’t add any of it. I receive all info, including personal stories and filter according to relevancy.
-
An outsider becoming #1 an another region would objectively cause that emotion in at least a few people. I doubt you can refute that. 2nd, he was incredibly boastful along with confrontational. Would that not be considered “rubbing his nuts” in your faces?
3rd, this video wasn’t about STL and his “antics” was a vague term that can be construed to encompass literally anything you might toss in. But it didn’t matter for the subject matter, so I didn’t spend 10min elaborating.
-
-
To cover the legitimacy of his WWA ban without covering the same player’s bans in several other regions would be like prosecuting a felon without accounting for his other felonies. Context is dangerously important to understand the full scope of a person’s behaviors/habits
-
To convict someone for a crime he already did the time for is even more negligence than that. If you completely disregard the facts of a new issue just because of the record, what could be say for the accuracy in any litigation? That’s pure conflation.
- 1 weitere Antwort
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.