@TeamYouTube Hello! UMG has falsely claimed two copyrights on my *unlisted* performance of the Carmina Burana. UMG does not own the recording (I am certain because I was IN the recording) and none of their affiliated artists were involved, but they have rejected my disputes.
-
Show this thread
-
This recording is for my professional portfolio use, and I have permission from the original owners of the recording (Aspen Music Festival dub room engineers) to use it in this manner, but I am afraid that UMG may still copyright strike me even if they have no legal ownership!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Dies_Mali
Thanks for the tag – because there’s a set of copyrights to protect the writers of songs for the lyrics/melody they've created, covers can still receive Content ID claims. If you think the claim is incorrect, check this article on what to do next: https://yt.be/help/LKJN
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TeamYouTube
Thank you for replying! Already filed a dispute, but they rejected it, and so I have appealed. The music in question was written in 1936 and the composer (Carl Orff) has been dead for 38 years. UMG does not own the rights to it, only certain recordings. Mine is not one they own.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Dies_Mali @TeamYouTube
Can they still copyright strike me for music they do not legally own? There are MANY recordings of this work by many different orchestras, and under many different labels (or no label at all, like the one I'm disputing). UMG was in no way involved with this specific recording.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
After appealing a rejected dispute, the copyright owner has 30 days to respond – we'd recommend waiting for their decision to be made. In the meantime, if you're looking for more info, here's the FAQs about fair use: https://yt.be/help/3Zuw
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.