These 207 videos are already taken down, only about 20 more are in review mode. So why is this channel still live and monetized if it has 207 takedowns applied in the past 48 hours?
-
-
Replying to @kerrymuzzey
Thanks for sharing more info. Mind sharing the Channel URL so we can look into it further? Keep us posted!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TeamYouTube
Music Publisher Support has the full details already & you should be able to get that info from them. I can also DM you if your DM’s are open.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kerrymuzzey
Content ID claims don't takedown channels but copyright strikes can. Here's more info on the difference: https://yt.be/help/ug1Q You can submit a copyright takedown using this form: https://yt.be/help/6qSE – take note that by doing this, you are starting a legal process.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TeamYouTube
I’ve been a Content ID user for 6 years: I know how it works. YouTube’s TOS (https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2802032?hl=en …) state that 3
strikes delete a channel. I have applied 220 legitimate strikes to 1 channel in the last 48 hrs and it remains online & fully monetized. Why?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kerrymuzzey
You're correct that 3 strikes can terminate a channel, but Content ID claims do not result in strikes–claims and strikes are completely separate. With CID you can block, track, or monetize, but not strike. Read through this: https://yt.be/help/ug1Q
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TeamYouTube
You can do takedowns on unlicensed uses through Content ID: it’s the “Takedown” button w/DMCA certification. To clarify further, I did 220 individual takedowns on 1 channel through Content ID. These are takedowns which result in
strikes. So this channel now has 220 /11 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kerrymuzzey @TeamYouTube
Takedowns (and associated strikes) and it remains online and fully monetized with forced ads on all remaining videos. Claims are claims until you do a takedown: then they become takedowns and strikes. /2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kerrymuzzey @TeamYouTube
Care to explain how 220 takedowns in 48 hours - that is, 220 strikes - doesn’t violate the 3 strikes rule? /3
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kerrymuzzey @TeamYouTube
Can you let me know how 220 takedowns (220 strikes) does not violate the 3 strikes rule & why this channel is still live w/forced pre-roll ads on all videos & banner ads?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Mind sharing with us the Channel URL that you're reporting so we can look into this further? Keep us posted.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.