it's staying pretty steady,https://twitter.com/drsplace/status/1069415178473693184?s=20 …
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
it's staying pretty steady,https://twitter.com/drsplace/status/1069415178473693184?s=20 …
Yes, as Dr. Tonsor can articulate way better than me, his graph isn’t consumption or availability alone, but also accounts for willingness-to-pay, which is the key difference between consumption & demand.
And as poverty is decreased across world (as we hope it will be), history shows that meat consumption rises. 413.3 million in Sub-Saharan Africa have <$2/day Meat consumption in China, Vietnam trebled over past 20y as GDP's rosehttps://ourworldindata.org/grapher/meat-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita?time=1990 …
Even then. I'll just eat hotdogs, cubed steak and hamburger meat instead of the good steak. Never going to lay off the red meat.
Beef? What will get people to cut back on *fossil fuels* which have much more than marginal impacts on GHG emissions? Or hey, we can sanctimoniously eat less beef while the main drivers of climate change charge ahead.
It's almost impossible to believe that my dietary choices will affect the fate of the planet. And I like beef.
Health risks of Beef vs chicken is pretty compelling. Also, cost of chicken breast vs cost of any non-hamburger cut. Cheap cheap cheap" steak at my grocer is at least 2.5x the cost of the equivalent wt of chicken breast.
At the roots, any food that was produced by a choosen system that causes death, degradation and desertification of the soil should be eaten less. The real need is in first understanding the nature of producing food on earth.
3 syllables Chick-Fil-A. @ChickfilA
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.