![Henrik [eɪʧ-ɛn-ɑː-keɪ]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1213609749985423360/zUdQjz-3_normal.jpg)
Very cool. So the opposite of "explicitly specified" would be "standard"?
The lesson: If something is missing in #wireshark, just open a bug!
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16340 …
Thanks to @Lekensteyn @alagoutte @WiresharkNews for fixing it in 1 week time since I reported.
Which version will include it and when will it be released?https://twitter.com/Lekensteyn/status/1222683424487550976 …
-
-
-
In the standard case you will not have this field (as it is today)
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
it is already available on nighty build https://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/ … and it will be available on next major release (3.4.x) Planned of end of year ? (it is enhance and not a bug, it is not backport to current release)
-
Novi razgovor -
-
-
It will be part of the next major release, anything newer than v3.3.0rc0-465-gaaad273ec1. Build it from git master or find automated builds for macOS and Windows on https://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/ …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.