Whatever the person needs.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
There is no 90% group, unless you have the research for that as well.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Checked out the referred links. Only one has statistically significant numbers and is recent enough to be relevant. That study (Steensma et al, 2013) only talks of those *referred* to GICs, not who are recommended for treatment. Even the biased article says 60-90% not 90%.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @KeithFarnish @MrPeterLMorris and
Huh? What is a "statistically significant number"? This sounds like you are referring to a power analysis, but misrepresenting its result. (You are correct that 90% desistance is likely an overestimate.)
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @JamesCantorPhD @MrPeterLMorris and
A study with 8 people, or 27 of whom 7 have GD are certainly not significant and certainly not representative of a population.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KeithFarnish @MrPeterLMorris and
Moreover, you are missing the headline: Every single study---large and small, recent or old, every country and every lab---produced exactly the same result. If sample size were a factor, the small and large studies would differ, but they are exactly the same.
2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @JamesCantorPhD @KeithFarnish and
What James said is exactly why my earlier comment about diagnostic criteria. Specificity was more ambiguous in DSM-4 (included effeminate boys w/o GD) which is no longer the case. Also to James point about outcomes as I said, hit me up in 18 months. Awaiting data.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @orpheusgrrl @KeithFarnish and
1. It is not up to me to hit you up. It is up to you to keep up with the science. 2. You have not responded to my prior question about what you believe the correspondence to be between DSM-IV and DSM-5 diagnoses.
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes
Why the wait on a magic number? Whether 50%,60% or 70% desistence rate, it is *not* zero. It is baked in. So how does trans med mitigate false positives? Track desisters? Learn from them to improve your srvcs? Are patients told people do desist? R desistence srvcs available?#ROGD
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.