(1/5) As a member of the House SS&T Committee, a Representative of many great NASA employees & contractors, & someone directly involved in this process, I would love to correct the record. The spread of misinformation doesn’t do anyone good, does it? https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/01/house-bill-seeks-to-gut-nasas-artemis-plan-resurrect-journey-to-mars/?amp=1 …
-
-
go in 2024 then.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your response is pretty underwhelming and lacks any details
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This bill is heavily slanted towards handing Boeing even more money. Given their lack of performance on their recent uncrewed Starliner demo flight, I'd be hesitant to do that, to say the least.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Randy, this has been in the works for decades, with nothing to show for, and no one believes you. This is a vendor-driven program, not a purpose driven one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You fail to address the primary point, that it is giving the thing to Boeing, which it demonstrably is. We're stuck with SLS, but the goal should be to do the most with amount of money allocated, not spend the most money to do the minimum.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the draft provisions are too specific and unattached to any technical rationale; the draft is a scandal, not a work in progress
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why is your first "fact" that it is subject to change? Is that because you know that Ars was correct as it currently was handed to you by Boeing, and so your only way out is later revisions?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
6 rendezvous. Lol. You need to fire your advisor. The current plan is not being opposed because of politics. It is statistically impossible. Engineering needs to be as simple as possible. Not the opposite.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Our congressional rocket scientists have not surprisingly designed the most expensive solution with the lowest possible economic return."https://spacenews.com/op-ed-nasa-need-another-space-assignment/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.



