TWQ

@TWQgw

Housed & published , The Washington Quarterly analyzes global strategy & its public policy implications. RTs ≠ endorsement.

Washington D.C.
twq.elliott.gwu.edu
Joined September 2012
114 Photos and videos Photos and videos

Tweets

You blocked @TWQgw

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @TWQgw

  1. Pinned Tweet
    Sep 22

    Our Fall 2021 issue is live! In our feature section, After US Troops Leave, & discuss how the US can leverage access to change its global force posture, and answers why the US loses wars while Russia and Iran win

    1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    Oct 25

    The U.S. should work to ensure continued stability in Asia by adopting a more defensive posture and leaning on allies to do more to defend themselves. Read more about "defensive defense" in .

    1 retweet
    Undo
  3. Retweeted
    Oct 22

    Even if nuclear weapons aren't necessarily the answer, Lind and Press are right that South Korea's security challenges are real and something has to change. and I discuss in some ways the US can reassure Seoul, but that's just a start.

    1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  4. Retweeted
    Oct 20

    The U.S. should work to ensure continued stability in Asia by adopting a more defensive posture and leaning on allies to do more to defend themselves. Read more about "defensive defense" in .

    3 retweets 5 likes
    Undo
  5. Retweeted
    Oct 11

    I provide some examples in this article, "Cold War Lessons and Fallacies for US-China Relations Today."

    There a few historical examples when linkage has worked regarding great power relations. Chinese leaders should be studying the Cold War to learn the limits of that strategy.
    1 reply 4 retweets 12 likes
    Undo
  6. Retweeted
    Oct 11

    As part of a broad, persistent, asymmetric competition underway in the information domain, Russia and China promote narratives that advance their geopolitical interests. For , I lay them out 👇

    1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  7. Retweeted
    Oct 1

    The prospect of early North Korean nuclear use in a conflict is not new, but the ongoing growth in Pyongyang’s nuclear forces and shifts in its capabilities present substantial complications. In , explains what policymakers can do about it:

    1 reply 4 retweets 7 likes
    Undo
  8. Retweeted
    Sep 29

    Japan’s new incoming PM Kishida Fumio mentioned “economic statecraft” and argued “we need to think about national security from a variety of perspectives, not just force." To learn more, please read my new piece on “Japan’s New Economic Statecraft”

    3 retweets 2 likes
    Undo
  9. Retweeted
    Sep 24

    Beijing shares Moscow's objective of weakening Europe and the transatlantic alliance, but has different long term goals, as we describe here in 👇

    1 reply 2 retweets 1 like
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  10. Retweeted
    Sep 27

    FPRI's writing for Why the United States Is Losing—And Russia and Iran Are Winning Access the article here:

    3 retweets 1 like
    Undo
  11. Retweeted
    Sep 26

    "Given its importance, acquiring access is an administration and Pentagon imperative. But it is arguably the hardest part of posture to secure. From a new essay on U.S. force posture that's worth reading ahead of the Global Posture Review. Link:

    4 retweets 9 likes
    Undo
  12. Retweeted
    Sep 25

    Does Kim Jong Un intend to deploy tactical nuclear weapons? If so, how might these weapons manifest in the country’s existing nuclear forces and what challenges may arise for the United States and South Korea? examines these questions in :

    3 retweets 6 likes
    Undo
  13. Retweeted
    Sep 25

    Even as open information spaces confer important strategic advantages to democracies over the long run, they create vulnerabilities for them in the short term, writes . Liberal democracies need a proactive strategy to push back.

    3 retweets 3 likes
    Undo
  14. Retweeted
    Sep 24

    If you're in need of some weekend reading, check out my article with on the importance of access for changing forward presence in the upcoming US Global Force Posture Review. Now ungated at

    The US Global Force Posture Review seeks to create more resilient, combat-credible posture. But it requires changing access in the Indo-Pacific & Middle East. In , & I explore how the US can overcome access dilemmas to reshape posture.
    Show this thread
    3 retweets 14 likes
    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    Sep 23

    I have my weekend reading lined up: has assembled another fantastic issue of . Looking forward to reading pieces by and , , , , , and and Brad Glosserman.

    1 reply 4 retweets 24 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  16. Retweeted
    Sep 22

    I argue in the new that: " has repeatedly succeeded...at mobilizing the instruments of national power to achieve its political objectives" and that "Russia’s power projection toolkit... is likely to be sustainable for the foreseeable future."

    2 retweets 9 likes
    Undo
  17. Retweeted
    Sep 22

    My new co-authored article titled "Japan's New Economic Statecraft" is published on The Washington Quarterly (). This is the piece to read if you're interested in the latest economic security policies of Japan. Download free from the link below!

    1 reply 2 retweets 12 likes
    Undo
  18. Retweeted
    Sep 22

    Russia and China each deploy an evolving set of tactics and techniques to advance their geopolitical interests in the information domain. For , with the goal of informing policymakers across sectors, I lay them out. THREAD

    1 reply 34 retweets 75 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  19. Retweeted
    Sep 22

    My new piece Why does the United States struggle on the battlefield, relative to Iran and Russia...? Part of the answer is strategic culture

    3 retweets 3 likes
    Undo
  20. Retweeted
    Sep 23

    Excited to see my piece with out in ! While debates over US global force posture tend to focus on forward presence, we look at the critical element of access: how the US can use its bases and forces to achieve military ends (1/4).

    1 reply 11 retweets 34 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  21. Retweeted
    Sep 23

    The US Global Force Posture Review seeks to create more resilient, combat-credible posture. But it requires changing access in the Indo-Pacific & Middle East. In , & I explore how the US can overcome access dilemmas to reshape posture.

    2 replies 16 retweets 35 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo

@TWQgw hasn't Tweeted yet.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·