She seems to be saying that I shouldn't dismantle bad pseudoscientific papers (e.g., papers promoting antivax pseudoscience, cancer quackery, other quackery) with extreme prejudice and copious sarcasm on my blogs. Let's just say that I disagree.https://twitter.com/DinaPomeranz/status/1141073115134476288 …
-
Show this thread
Replying to @gorskon
It is part of scientific integrity, something many "science skeptics" seem to be very keen on, indeed. What they have to understand is that critique is (as a rule) not directed at the SUBJECT of the paper but to the METHODS employed.
2:02 AM - 20 Jun 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.