LEFFEN#0Verifizierter Account

they can have that preference, but that doesn't mean it's correct to prefer it

i think starting position is much more important for win% in many matchups over port priority tbh also peach wants lower port vs fox 100%

so peach wants lower port to do a combo that fox can SDI out of anyway, when port 4 gives her better/longer CGs and easier upthrow escapes?

you can't actually easily SDI out of it, esp since he can delay it on purpose (tech trap mixup, non reactable). getting fox off low % is key

the high % cg doesn't actually matter much at all, esp on stages with platforms. neither does uthrow uair since it should never work anyway

>since it should never work anyway Disagree. "Should" is one thing, but port can still dramatically increase how often they get out.

either way, adding 1 frame on something that isnt true comboable (and even then sdiable) is far less than allowing a key low% combo starter

Thats fair, but I maintain that, w/ neutral start, port overall plays bigger role in matches than striking and RPP is worth taking a look at