. @Clumsy_Agent this is not how it actually works. There's a reason invitationals with the top 0,1% get tons of views.
-
-
Svar till @TSM_Leffen
viewership does not sustain or support most events. Top players & 0-2 players exist symbiotically.
3 svar 3 retweets 19 gillanden -
Svar till @TheHadou @TSM_Leffen
invitationals have great viewership but often have mediocre attendance. Both sides have to balance.
2 svar 0 retweets 11 gillanden -
Svar till @TheHadou @TSM_Leffen
Exactly. I'd watch an invitational, but I have absolutely no reason to physically attend one
1 svara 0 retweets 1 gillande -
agreed - however I think the argument still stands, the top 1% are definitely important for attendance
1 svara 0 retweets 6 gillanden -
Svar till @TSM_Leffen @TheHadou
Sure they're important, but the impact isn't really THAT large. At least for most fighting games
1 svara 0 retweets 0 gillanden -
Obviously important enough to get offers to fly me and several others to events 5 times a month.
4 svar 0 retweets 3 gillanden -
Svar till @TSM_Leffen
you absolutely offer an advertising value & a viewership reward. I don't think thats being discounted
1 svara 0 retweets 1 gillande -
Svar till @TheHadou
I do think smash is far more extreme than other fgs. Even then, Daigo will bring entrants.
3 svar 0 retweets 2 gillanden -
Svar till @TSM_Leffen @TheHadou
You guys are still valuable to the overall tournament success, but not at the entrant impact you think
1 svara 0 retweets 0 gillanden
I will agree to disagree. You should really compare regular series w top players in attendance tho.
Hämtningen verkar ta ett tag
Twitter kan vara överbelastat eller ha tillfälliga problem. Försök igen eller besök Twitter Status om du vill ha mer information.