This whole thing is why what @FictionIRL tweeted about avoiding the top 100 is the way, or we need seasons and circuitshttps://twitter.com/CaptainSmuckers/status/1172980481434030082 …
-
The problem with a panelist system is sadly that people are very biased and fickle in what they consider a real win. I already know that people will forget about what happened with the schedule at Shine but will absolutely see axe playing YL as proof the set doesnt count
And obv people forget if you go to a tournament and then DQ. The whole system is fucked honestly, the panelists have always had extremely varied (sometimes flawed) values so its why Ive never cared about any community decided ranking tbh.
-
-
I'm sad that you feel this way, since the point of the ranking is to increase publicity for the entire top level of the scene. Pre-2013 publicity was pretty disproportionately skewed towards the five gods to the detriment of most other players, and I don't want to return to that.
-
Me too, and I do think its better now than 2013 but its still not great. The fact that the system rewards me dropping out of shine when entering is clearly beneficial to the scene and its a chance (altho smaller than normal) to win a major is extremely fucked up tbh.
- 6 weitere Antworten
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
I just hope its not something that catches on and spreads because the system rewards it. Long term the people who take the chances they can to do well despite risking a "bad loss" will (hopefully) be rewarded.
-
I think we're capable of brainstorming a solution that rewards activity and punishes dq's. We could create a set of guidelines for panelists to reduce variance maybe?
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.