If your region bans Hero in Smash when there aren't enough results yet to decide whether he's worth banning, all you're doing is lowering the level of players in that region by denying matchup experience, lol
Diesen Thread anzeigen
-
If we were banning him for being too good this point would work. As it is now tournament results are completely irrelevant to the point being made, which is that the randomness is inherently uncompetitive and thus should be banned. We already know the %s.
and again, with this logic we have absolutely no data that final smash meters shouldnt be legal, so how dare we ban them? or Yggrassil/mementos hazards on. Or items, etc. Why don't we wait for the supreme data for these things?
-
-
In this case, because we already know what Smash players want out of a Smash game: they do not want *stage* randomness, and they do not want the excessive power granted by Final Smash attacks given how overbearingly, at-a-glance good they are.
-
We are actually not entirely sure where the line is on Hero, and as such you should *probably* let him rock for at the very least a little while, either until he gets patched because some aspects of his design are degenerate, or because everyone agrees to ban him (too wild).
- 1 weitere Antwort
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Also, as an aside, I'd love to see some side tournaments with Final Smash meter on and an additional stock, if only because I want to see if with some tuning, they can be made into something competitively interesting :)
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
-
-
These kinds of strawman arguments aren't helping your case.
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.