If your region bans Hero in Smash when there aren't enough results yet to decide whether he's worth banning, all you're doing is lowering the level of players in that region by denying matchup experience, lol
Diesen Thread anzeigen
-
Regardless of what you think the argument is for/against banning him, with no actual results to back up your claim, it is just that: a claim. Even if you think it's one backed up with a lot of logical reasoning, data reigns supreme. Get that data.
Diesen Thread anzeigen
If we were banning him for being too good this point would work. As it is now tournament results are completely irrelevant to the point being made, which is that the randomness is inherently uncompetitive and thus should be banned. We already know the %s.
-
-
and again, with this logic we have absolutely no data that final smash meters shouldnt be legal, so how dare we ban them? or Yggrassil/mementos hazards on. Or items, etc. Why don't we wait for the supreme data for these things?
-
In this case, because we already know what Smash players want out of a Smash game: they do not want *stage* randomness, and they do not want the excessive power granted by Final Smash attacks given how overbearingly, at-a-glance good they are.
- 2 weitere Antworten
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
It's not really a question of whether randomness is inherently uncompetitive or not, it's more about how much is too much. The people who are pro and anti-ban draw the line at two different places, it seems to me.
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.