LEFFEN#0Verifizierter Account

The whole Hero banning arguments are pretty silly because there is no way to validate any point since the character is so random. You can show me a clip when whack kills at 0% and I can show you two clips where it doesn’t kill until 100%. So where are we? Back at square one.

"theres a lot of data pointing to a flat earth, why do you think people used to believe the earth was flat"

I mean in that example, there is clear, objective evidence that the opposite is true, but the amount of Randomness Hero has that warrants a ban is not objective, that is subjective. My question is, what is TOO much randomness?

You say that, but scientists have been wrong before! You just choose to take some things as subjective and some as objective when it fits your agenda. Believing in round earth propaganda smh!

To be real with you though, the reason why I compare you with a flat earth believer is because you're basing your beliefs on things that are with "objectively" not true. No, smash is not the only scene that has taken an issue with RNG. If you played those games you would know.

What other scene banned a character based off their RNG kit? If I’m wrong, I have no problem saying im wrong, but I do not know any other scene that did that.

"i want to also point out that in a lot of other fighting games there is a character who have heavy RNG built into their moveset, but only smash player have ISSUES WITH THAT" read what you wrote. secondly - all characters in the fucking image don't even have RNG moves.