Zard is not worst in game nor is he a liability to the Trainer squad. He's simply mediocre.
-
-
Antwort an @Virum_SD
this is simply not true - if you look at actual matches and see how badly he does. Of course sometimes he gets a bair or usmash but that will happen less and less as people get better vs him and heavies dont generally scale well with the meta lmao
10 Antworten 1 Retweet 264 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @TSM_Leffen
You're quite adamant on this view so I'm not going to stop you from having it. I just can't agree in a game where Mac and K Rool exist in their current forms.
3 Antworten 0 Retweets 137 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @Virum_SD
Why post this if ur not going to argue the point if anyone disagrees lmao And no just cuz u think hes better than two bottom tiers does not make him mediocre lol
5 Antworten 0 Retweets 32 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @TSM_Leffen
I'm not going to argue *with you* because honestly it's a waste both of both our time & energy. Regardless of what I say your mind is set.
2 Antworten 1 Retweet 112 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @Virum_SD
ive changed my mind on plenty of things in ultimate, im legit curious as to why you think charizard is not a liability just because he (to you) better than little mac.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 9 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @TSM_Leffen @Virum_SD
To me there is definitely a chance hes not the worst, but to me I dont see him working as he should (stock tank/recovery/killer) in the PT trio, and in that way he is imo far from mediocre and is a liability.
4 Antworten 1 Retweet 14 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @TSM_Leffen
See now this has been framed differently. Had you asked for my opinion on why I felt the way I did from the jump rather than just saying "that's not true" I'd be more open to discussion.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 25 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @Virum_SD @TSM_Leffen
The main thing is that regardless of how bad Zard is, I can't see him as a liability because his existence doesn't subtract from PT, rather at worst he adds very little. He's an underwhelming asset rather than a liability.
2 Antworten 1 Retweet 24 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @Virum_SD
well the thing is, since ivy isnt consistent enough at killing vs most top tiers, you still need to play charizard, and thats why everyone eventually plays him and generally, does very poorly. it also makes Ivys down b awful, since if he swapped to squirtle one of his main flaws
3 Antworten 0 Retweets 6 Gefällt mir
would be a little less awful (getting down/getting out of disadv). imo because of charizard being so awful if you cant kill well with Ivy you probably lose the MU - and I think if you look at most high level PT matches this constantly becomes a turning point in games.
-
-
Antwort an @TSM_Leffen
On the other side of that coin, removing Zard and swapping from Ivy to Squirtle would lead to various instances where the character would just lose the stock when they could've survived as Zard. Recovery moments/when the switch is called out in disadvantage etc
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 6 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @Virum_SD
of course, but I dont think those really outweigh the drawbacks. regardless i think PT -should- be a character where the debate of "is pt better of never playing a character" should never even take place, if its properly designed at all.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 14 Gefällt mir - 2 weitere Antworten
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.