This isn’t discussed often, but TO’s improve through practice - just like players. A sponsor or new event partner doesn’t magically imbue experience. Making mistakes and reflecting on them does.
Diesen Thread anzeigen
-
I don’t fully agree with the seeding statement, but do agree that constructive feedback is always useful. I’m one of the guys generally requesting it.
You don't agree with doing open seeding? Why not? Right now when discussion about seeding came up people just claimed "this is not the correct seeding" (when its the bracket that matters) and so on - to avoid confusion it should be done much more clearly and earlier.
-
-
I think open seeding, as with open attendance lists, can often create negative and/or distracting talking points (about both players and events) that aren’t always warranted. This is a perspective obviously, but one I haven’t been convinced not to hold yet.
-
This doesn’t mean that brackets shouldn’t be discussed and refined (as they need to be), but I’d much rather that be stablized by trustees than a public forum. Particularly when influencer impact in our communities is so strong.
- 5 weitere Antworten
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.