Why should she have to rule out impeachment? That’s not how this works, that’s not how any of this works 
-
-
-
She said we shouldn’t avoid impeachment for political reason. So if there are evidence of high crimes while in office Trump will be impeached. That’s how I understood what she said
-
This comment is in response to how she was asked the question. It felt like the interviewer wants her to say we can’t indict a sitting president. Her response was fine, she shouldn’t have to be pigeonholed to comment if impeachment is on or off the table
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sounds to me like she's worried about the wrong thing. They need to fund that wall, so we can: 1 get the damn thing built, and 2 get the government opened back up...
-
Our loser president said Mexico was. His supporters should be up in arms that he’s now shut down the govt unless we pay for it ourselves!
-
Oh, they'll pay for it. Indirectly.
-
Ok think about it like this. If they pay for it indirectly will we get our money back as a refund? He's almost making it sound like loan but its not.
-
Who gives a damn who pays for, really. It needs to be done. Let's just be real about it...
-
Everyone should give a damn! This is an EXTREMELY expensive project that could be paying for many, many other things this country needs. Where are the comprehensive studies showing a wall is the best and most cost-effective solution?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, but Impeachment *is* a ***political*** remedy whose need was foreseen. There are judicial remedies for crimes and civil offenses. You don’t need Impeachment to remedy treason or money laundering.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Smart. She is building a bi-partisan relationship and at the same time preparing an attack on many fronts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hope Nancy doesn't fall into Media trap,she needs to stay focus,and remember,it was Voters,who gave them Leadership,Media doesn't speak for Voters,Media Journalists are doing a paid job,Opinions Floats back and forward
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don’t seek out something to impeach on. It will come to you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mueller needs evidence first.
-
I think he has plenty of That!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Um she said we can’t impeach unless there is evidence. Exactly what you should want to hear.
-
They are blinded by the TDS. Sound bytes are all they can absorb. She said exactly what I would have said.
-
Exactly, I’m glad the D’a are being measured about this. GOP would’ve already started impeachment proceedings if this was a dem.
-
The GOP would have simply accepted the results of the election instead of falsely claiming campaign collusion with the Russians.
#soreloser -
You want me to believe that all of this is a deep state conspiracy & that the intel community fabricated this to sabotage Trumps Presidency? Sorry, I can’t get there. That sounds insane.
#TooManyMovies. -
Not to sabotage the Presidency, that can be easily accomplished with a complicit media (we see that daily), but to remove him from office.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.