Can a product few use ever be considered "well designed?" Are acceptance & scale prerequisites for great design or challenges to design?
-
-
@hunterwalk What about products that tons of people use that are obviously terribly "designed"? -
@pmarca certainly don't think mass use has to = good design. But good design = usability, & scale often = usability challenges -
@hunterwalk How does one square the importance of design for success with the success of Craigslist? -
@hunterwalk@pmarca Good design is diff than aesthetics. IMO CL was well designed for its time and purpose. Eg email loop for auth... -
@othman@hunterwalk Do we therefore know good design by its resulting market success? Success means the design was good? -
@pmarca@othman@hunterwalk success means the product delivered value. design is often a contributor or key. success isn't defined as scale. -
@satyap@pmarca@hunterwalk most impt. part of good design is making something people want/need. get that wrong and nothing else matters -
@satyap@pmarca@hunterwalk CL solved massive problem in a way that scaled. Network effect negated economic incentive for good UI/UX
@satyap @pmarca @hunterwalk for product to gain traction, utility of design must be > utility of incumbent x network effect factor
-
@satyap@pmarca@hunterwalk so IMO yes, a product can be "well designed"and not gain traction if switching costs/network effect too strong
Hunter Walk
Marc Andreessen
Othman Laraki
Satya Patel
T.J. Ross