Seems most abortions could be avoided if men wear protection everytime.
You’re suggesting men should get incredibly invasive (and again irreversible, unlike oral contraception, and full of side effects in a sizeable minority) procedures and should be stigmatized for not getting it. And I’m opposed to circumcision. But it also isn’t really comparable
-
-
Bottom line, in consensual sexual encounters, both people are responsible for the results. Either take responsibility for yourself or keep your pants on. Don’t try and suggest sterilization of other people to make your life easier.
-
You don't understand the bottom line. If one of the parts doesn't want to use condom, then the responsibility of birth control is always put on women, even to the point where we are blamed for getting pregnant. Another way is suggested in order to shift this responsibility...
-
... but it is always dismissed. Male oral contraception which is nom invasive has too many side effects (the same that women have been experiencing), vasectomy is too invasive yet it takes less than 30 minutes just once and solves all unwanted pregnancies. All dismissed. Why?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.