Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @TGowdySC
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @TGowdySC
-
Prikvačeni tweet
People are passionate about our country, current events, and the obligations and nature of fairness. There are questions worth exploring, even if we do not agree on the answers. I'd be interested in your perspective.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Q14: Since honest people can tell lies and mendacious people can tell the truth, what are the best tools for determining credibility?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Q13: How many “relevant witnesses” would you access?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Q12: What is your definition of “relevant witnesses”?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Q11: What tends to make you believe certain witnesses over other witnesses if the testimonies are not reconcilable?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Q10: If witnesses can be summoned, but are not, who bears the burden of explaining why those witnesses were not summoned?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Happy 60th Birthday
@GOPLeader from Tim and Trey. (Ratcliffe left before the bill came).pic.twitter.com/jcbkGKIyAY
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Q9: Is there a difference between being "fair" and being "complete"? Can you be one without the other? If the House did not consider the testimony of a witness during the impeachment investigation, should the Senate consider that witness in deliberating a verdict? Why/why not?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Q8: How do you define hearsay? How do you determine the reliability of hearsay evidence?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Q7: Should the rules of evidence which govern civil and criminal trials be used in impeachment proceedings?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Always prepared and always professional
@marthamaccallum. Thank you for having me on your show.https://www.foxnews.com/media/trey-gowdy-schiff-impeachment-case-senate-republicans …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Q6: Should branch disputes be fast-tracked in court so the resolution does not linger and a failure to comply is not rewarded?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Q5: If a witness does not offer testimony during the investigation, can that witness offer testimony during the trial? Should he or she?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Q4: Can you call a witness you know will invoke a testimonial or investigative privilege?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Q3: What is the proper role for the Senate in impeachment? Deliberate? Investigate? Litigate? Some hybrid of all 3? What is the explanation for calling witnesses in the Senate if those witnesses were not heard in the House?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Q2: Do any presumptions attach to judges, civil officers, or presidents who are impeached? Is there a presumption of innocence at the beginning of the trial?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Q1: What is the appropriate evidentiary standard by which articles of impeachment should be proven? Preponderance? Clear and convincing? Beyond a reasonable doubt? How would you define those terms to someone unfamiliar with our justice system?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
From us to you ... hope 2020 is the best.pic.twitter.com/rA8O8m7siK
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Eventually, someone in the media will break down and actually get to know you as the conscientious, hard working member you are. Until then, just keep going.https://www.foxnews.com/media/elise-stefanik-elizabeth-warren-double-standard …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
You keep going Elise. You’ll have to change parties or genders to be treated fairly by the NYT, WaPo or Politico. (Actually with Politico even that wouldn’t work.)
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.