Thanks, saw that reuploaded video but checked the URL provided in the description -- sorry for the confusion. Still the "elliot amv" video was correctly taken down, but not for hate speech. That specific video received violated our policies on harmful/dangerous content.
-
-
Replying to @TeamYouTube
How is "elliot amv" a harmful or dangerous video?
10 replies 34 retweets 886 likes -
Replying to @SimianJimmy @VincentHatesGod
Should have been in the email you received but we don't allow content that appears to be posted in a shocking, sensational, or disrespectful manner. Including promoting, glorifying or encouraging violence (e.g. mass shootings).
329 replies 7 retweets 60 likes -
Replying to @TeamYouTube @VincentHatesGod
Context is also important. The only depictions of such activities that we may allow need to be educational or documentary in nature and shouldn’t be designed to help or encourage others to imitate them. Here's a good resource on context: https://goo.gl/ZsGs9Q
333 replies 8 retweets 52 likes -
Replying to @TeamYouTube @VincentHatesGod
Hey
@TeamYouTube, if you really believe what he did is considered "hate speech", allow me to show your contradictions! According to your guidelines, it states that we can't produce content "inciting hatred against individuals or groups based on certain attributes". Jot this down.pic.twitter.com/qzaTIHfbuM
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Also, it points out that there are circumstances where videos that sound mean or insulting ISN'T considered hate speech. But apparently, you can't tell that Mumkey Jones' content is satire, even when dealing with topics that might relate to hate speech, but ISN'T! Let me explain.pic.twitter.com/YF54gcTavK
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
I've looked into some of your "advertiser-friendly" channels (one of which I found through the help of Power Online's video here: https://bit.ly/2CjRiah ), with one of the examples being Lilly Singh. Lilly made a video mocking old people. So does that constitute as hate speech??pic.twitter.com/fweM3yxHHT
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I was about to continue this thread, but I will probably tomorrow cuz I had to work on submitting an assignment for college. This thread will be continued later, but I assure you YouTube is still hypocritical for censoring Mumkey.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Alright
@TeamYouTube, I'm back for round 2. Now where was I? Oh yeah! Lilly was also responsible for posting a terrible video about making stereotypical jokes as a response to a fake comment. Surely that counts as "hate speech", doesn't it??pic.twitter.com/wPE5itmwR9
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Stephen Colbert brings on discussion about religion on a late night comedy show. I guess according to you, talking about religion should be considered "hateful".pic.twitter.com/Mqv5Oxf3NT
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Furthermore @TeamYouTube, EmpLemon points out that you still have plane crash compilations TO THIS DAY!! (proof here https://twitter.com/EmperorLemon/status/1073818604565655552 …) Isn't this supposed to be "violent, shocking, or sensational" content? Why aren't these being terminated?!!pic.twitter.com/yvDvGw7SHP
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.