Note this isn’t a tech reporting section, and editors often make their own subheads for writers. It’s blameless. It’s just funny to remember most dont venerate these numbers the way we do.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Can’t wait for 512 limit
-
That would be just a bit more...
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
They are right!!! I would have understood a 255 person limit, though :)
-
They count from 1, not 0. A group chat with no people doesn't exist :)
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
So, every person in the chat is assigned a unique 8 bit unsigned integer for... Some reason?
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
my favorite part is still all the nerds in the replies pretending there's any technical reason this makes sense, like whatsapp runs on a cloud made of game boy colors
- Još 6 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Well. it *is* a strange number to use as the maximum number of people in a group... 255 I would understand - but 256? Why? Why waste 7 bits and not use 65,535 as the limit instead?
-
Hm, ot does match up, or? First person is person[0], last is person[255].
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.