For my 2 cents, strong "prerequisite" in the premise led to the inevitable conclusion of "false". Likely lots to learn from DL! But can't see evidence there are things we'd only learn from DL, and that no other area of research in the whole of future neuroscience could show us
-
-
-
I don’t regret “prerequisite” insofar as it forced the issue but I agree the word is too strong.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
You can keep busy chewing for a long time. I was thinking yes in the sense of “take one or two grad-school classes”, not extensive chewing :)
-
Me thinking about brains and artificial neural networks.pic.twitter.com/FXclTV1zCl
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I agree with
@SussilloDavid that our understanding of DL is likely to come earlier and to illuminate our quest to understand how the brain processes information. But a prerequisite? I doubt it - but then it is just an opinionHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
True, in Einstein's sense: "There could be no fairer destiny for any physical theory than that it should point the way to a more comprehensive theory in which it lives on as a limiting case." DL will be superseded, but understanding why it works at all will help us move on.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
FWIW, I would agree with "invaluable" but I wouldn't necessarily agree with "prerequisite". But that's probably splitting hairs.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.


