As a Hoosier, I am highly disappointed in your position. This FAVORS ethics offenders in Congress. Please reconsider.
I will work in a bipartisan manner w/ the Office to ensure its independence & maintain the highest ethical standards of the House.pic.twitter.com/Jh6fqoiOgk
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please. This is the foxes appointing themselves to guard the henhouse.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Truly independent oversight is essential to good governance. Why make REDUCING independent oversight your top priority?
-
Will OCE have authority to investigate anonymous tips by whisteblowers?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Having the House overseeing this Office is NOT in the best interests of the public. Please vote for the people you represent.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Jack Abramoff does not approve http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/house-ethics-panel-jack-abramoff-233126 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and so it begins...nice spin job. Not buying it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
The way to do that is NOT gutting the committee. Don't spin it! No one believes you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How does this ensure the highest ethics? I voted for you in 2016 and your explanation does not justify this action.pic.twitter.com/oAk3GtfGNm
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.