Susan W. BrooksVerified account

So you don't 1. See any problem with a president under investigation for essentially treason deciding life long appointments, 2. Think it's a coincidence he appoints the one on the list who thinks the president shouldn't be charged with a crime? This is NOT BAU, congresswoman.

But, of course, you recommend we wait until after the next election cycle, right? After all...

So, you are completely in support of special interest groups compiling a list of judges that are aligned with their interests and our POTUS picking one from that list he thinks will support him should anything involving him, his family and Russia find its way to SCOTUS? Got it.

You’re wrong. I didn’t vote for you. And will never vote for you. Do not give this administration legs to walk all over us.

A President under investigation should not select a Supreme Court Justice who has already publicly stated he is against a President being required to submit to subpoena and against a President’s involvement in legal proceedings. #ConflictOfInterest

Most of us are scared to death by political right wing extremists on the SCOTUS. Women’s rights to control their own bodies, workers’ rights, consumers’ rights, healthcare. It could all get squeezed to the breaking point if Kavanaugh is confirmed.

What civil rights, liberties, and freedoms are you hoping he protects? A lot of minorities, women, and LGBTQ+ think he will do the opposite.

Was Mitch McConnell and your party wrong in 2016 to delay consideration of Merek Garland or are you wrong now for not waiting for the election to "allow the people to decide"?