Thank you for taking the time to read, it would be great to hear your thoughts.
-
-
-
"Fully reversible". Yet, "No adolescent withdrew from puberty suppression, and all started cross-sex hormone treatment" (De Vries et al., 2011) compared to ~80% desistance without PB http://www.sexologytoday.org/2016/01/do-trans-kids-stay-trans-when-they-grow_99.html …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The campaign is for evidence based practice. They're not calling for interventions to be offered arbitrarily, they're saying tavistock seems to be allowing unsubstantiated prejudices to cloud their practice.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Hormone therapy to induce puberty consistent with their gender identity" (American guidelines). My understanding from other reading is that blockers followed by cross-sex hormones means no puberty of any kind, just development of secondary chatacteristics. Can anyone confirm?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please show me where I "seem to want to increase the scope of transition". The research conflates trans kids with non conforming.
-
We also read the papers (and the PhD thesis) you know? Don't feed us with BS.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Zucker's work and older studies are dismissed just because they are not according to current trans creed. Yet none of the promoters of said creed (Serano etc) has a peer reviewed paper published with their criticisms.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes, it is child abuse.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.