For the poorest half, it would cost way way less. Lets do them first. See how it goes.
-
-
-
They're not high emitters, though.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
In current irrational era, as the US fails to invest in itself, highly rec this paper by Berkouwer here http://bit.ly/3b43sU6 which I also wrote about for
@RockyMtnInst here https://theenergytransition.org/article/leapfrogging-a-well-intended-notion-in-need-of-an-upgrade/ …. And yes, transitioning away from combustion would unleash massive savings.Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Yes, but the world order of power and control would change, and that can't happen.
-
We're betting the farm it can.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
That estimate $73 Tril. is way off. Way too high. Watch for the Q PRIZE coming out soon. It's a Global Game Changer on Global Warming.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
And much less than we hand over to oil and gas companies to keep them in business
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
@dwallacewells Did you mean to retweet this?Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Cloud cuckoo land- only feasible alternative is nuclear anything else is global mass starvation
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.